Where is the line between trauma activation and abusive behaviour?

When you are in a relationship with someone who has a history of trauma, intimacy itself can become a powerful trigger.


This may be because the trauma occurred in a relational or sexual context, or because being close to another person inevitably brings you into contact with the parts of them that hold fear, threat, or memories of past harm. Relationships invite vulnerability, and vulnerability is often where trauma lives.

As a result, trauma activation is common in intimate relationships. But understanding trauma activation does not mean ignoring the impact of behaviour. This is where many people feel confused, conflicted, or stuck.


What trauma activation can look like

Trauma activation occurs when the nervous system responds to a present-day situation as though a past threat is happening again. The body and brain react automatically, often outside conscious control.

Trauma activation tends to fall along a spectrum.


Hyperarousal (fight / defend responses)

This can look like:

  • Yelling or raised voice

  • Anger or hostility

  • Blame, accusations, or defensiveness

  • Retaliation or verbal aggression


Hypoarousal (freeze / withdraw responses)

This can look like:

  • Emotional withdrawal or shutdown

  • Going silent or becoming unresponsive

  • Avoiding conversations or intimacy

  • Dissociation or emotional numbness

Both patterns are attempts to protect the self from perceived danger.

If you are on the receiving end of these responses — particularly if you have your own trauma history — they can be deeply painful, destabilising, and reactivating.


Trauma explains behaviour, but it does not remove its impact

This distinction is essential.

When trauma responses are activated, the behaviour is triggered by the relationship, but it is driven by the reactivation of traumatic memory and the nervous system’s survival response.

However, impact still matters.

Regardless of where behaviour comes from, repeated yelling, blame, emotional withdrawal, intimidation, or emotional neglect can be harmful and damaging to relationships. Trauma does not make someone abusive, but trauma also does not automatically make harmful behaviour acceptable.

Understanding trauma helps us make sense of behaviour. It does not require us to tolerate ongoing harm.


So where is the line?

The line is not about intention. It is about responsibility, accountability, and repair.

Trauma activation moves into abusive territory when:

  • Harmful behaviour is minimised, denied, or justified

  • Responsibility is externalised (“you made me do this”)

  • There is no effort to reflect on patterns or make changes

  • The other partner is expected to absorb harm indefinitely

  • Fear, control, or emotional unsafety become ongoing features of the relationship

Trauma activation remains something that can be worked with when:

  • The person acknowledges the impact of their behaviour

  • There is willingness to reflect, repair, and learn

  • Responsibility for regulation is taken seriously

  • Repair follows activation, rather than avoidance

  • Boundaries are respected, even when they are difficult


Emotions vs behaviour

A core principle in trauma-informed relationships is this:

All emotions are valid. Not all behaviours are acceptable.

Fear, anger, shame, panic, or withdrawal may arise automatically during trauma activation. But how those emotions are expressed, and how harm is addressed afterward, is where responsibility lies.

This distinction allows compassion without collapse.


Responsibility in trauma-affected relationships

Healing in relationships requires responsibility at multiple levels.

  1. Responsibility for self-understanding

  • Learning personal triggers and early warning signs

  • Naming trauma patterns without outsourcing blame

  • Recognising when past and present are being confused


    2. Responsibility for regulation

  • Developing strategies to pause, ground, or step away

  • Seeking support when regulation is consistently difficult

  • Not relying on a partner to manage or absorb dysregulation


    3. Collaboration, not blame

  • Treating trauma as a shared context, not a shared fault

  • Asking “How do we manage this together?” rather than “Who is wrong?”


    4. Shared plans for safety during activation

  • Agreed-upon time-outs or pause signals

  • Clear boundaries around yelling, withdrawal, or escalation

  • Commitments to return, repair, and reconnect after space is taken

Boundaries are not punishments. They are structures that make safety - and therefore healing -  possible.


When to seek support

Trauma activation in relationships is common, and many couples are able to work with it through increased awareness, communication, and shared safety strategies.

However, additional support may be important if:

  • Trauma responses are frequent, intense, or escalating

  • Yelling, blame, or withdrawal occur without repair or accountability

  • One partner feels responsible for regulating the other’s emotions

  • Boundaries are repeatedly crossed or dismissed

  • Fear, emotional unsafety, or “walking on eggshells” becomes ongoing

  • Conversations about impact are minimised, denied, or turned back onto the other person

  • Trauma is used (explicitly or implicitly) to justify ongoing harm

Seeking support is not a sign that a relationship has failed. Often, it means the nervous systems involved need more containment than the relationship alone can provide.

Support may include individual trauma therapy, couples or relationship therapy, or psychoeducation focused on nervous system regulation and repair. If you are unsure whether what you are experiencing is trauma activation or abusive behaviour, a skilled clinician can help assess patterns, impact, and risk, and support decisions that prioritise safety and care.


A final thought

Relationships where both people are committed to healing and working with trauma can be profoundly reparative. Being witnessed, understood, and supported in intimacy can soften wounds that were once shaped in isolation.

But healing does not happen in the absence of boundaries.

For trauma to be worked with safely in relationships, there must be clarity, accountability, and consent around how pain is expressed and repaired. Compassion and limits are not opposites, they are partners.

Healing requires both.

Support & crisis lines (Australia)

Immediate Danger

If you or someone else is in immediate danger, call 000.


Lifeline Australia 

13 11 14
| 24/7
Confidential crisis support for people experiencing emotional distress, overwhelm, or feeling unsafe.

Beyond Blue

1300 22 4636 | 24/7
Support for anxiety, depression, and emotional distress. Also offers webchat and email support.


1800RESPECT

1800 737 732 | 24/7
National sexual assault, domestic and family violence counselling service. Available via phone and online chat.


Suicide Call Back Service

1300 659 467 | 24/7
Support for people experiencing suicidal thoughts, caring for someone at risk, or affected by suicide.


Mensline Australia

1300 78 99 78 | 24/7
Support for men experiencing relationship distress, emotional overwhelm, anger, or crisis.


QLife

1800 184 527 | 3pm–12am
Peer support for LGBTIQA+ people, including relationship distress, identity concerns, and mental health support.


13YARN

13 92 76 | 24/7
Crisis support for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, delivered by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander counsellors.

How can SHIPS support you?


AUTHOR

Dr. Sarah Ashton, PhD
Director & Founder of Sexual Health and Intimacy Psychological Services (SHIPS)

RELATED TRAINING FOR STUDENTS AND PRACTITIONERS:

Next
Next

Is it normal for sexual desire to reduce over the course of a relationship?